#publicspeaking

Speak With Authority

matthias-wagner-QrqeusbpFMM-unsplash.jpg

You’ve tackled the tech pivot. Now is the time to find your VOICE.

These weeks have been about juggling which Zoom link, what Teams feature, which Meet video setting, or what Hangout audio settings you needed. Now is the time to dial in your messaging and speak with authority.

The confidence you're seeking is not about self-worth - you've already got that. You just need a system.

A system to structure any presentation that comes your way.

A system to tap into your powerful, authentic, confident voice.

A system to ground you in the moments before you step on the stage.

Join me for my 4-week program and claim your power as a confident leader. Here’s how it works:

We meet once a week on Mondays. During the week, I support you via Marco Polo and a private Facebook group. The 4 week course starts on 06/08/2020 at 11:00am PST.

Tuition is $300.

Questions? Leave a comment to start the conversation. I’ll ask you a few questions to ensure we’re a fit and discuss the details.

Spring Training

Image 1.JPG

Happy Spring Break!


I'm offering individual coaching sessions via Zoom from Monday March 16th to Friday April 3rd.

As well, I have a small number of in-person session times available in Vancouver, B.C. (with heightened hygiene practices, no handshake greetings, etc, for public health reasons).

Audition coaching, voice training, text analysis...your time, your choice. We have the technology - let's keep working!

Just reply here to let me know you're interested, and I'll send you details about rates and scheduling.

See you in the virtual studio!
Alison

Remote Possibilities

1.jpg

The other day I was talking with an NGO executive who was concerned about the environmental impact of all her air travel for speaking engagements in different cities. This reminded me of an excellent article by UBC Math Professor, Malabika Pramanik, whom I had the pleasure of working with at the Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies.

Environmentalists, academics, executives, artists…people in many sectors are turning to alternatives like video conferencing. Yes, there are constraints (Professor Pramanik describes some of them), and no, the technology is not perfect. But, as my wonderful colleague Matt Smith of Adrenaline Studios points out, “it’s just a bandwidth issue right now.” And “right now” moves pretty fast in the tech world. As the picture gets clearer and the glitches are fewer and farther between, I believe this way of working will become a more regular part of our lives. And this is actually a good thing.

I won’t get too heavy about the environmental impacts of air travel. I won’t go on about how many younger people already use these options to connect across distances, and I don’t hear them grumbling about it. And I’ll only briefly mention the people who feel strongly enough about the issue to make some serious professional changes. If a choreographer can work via remote technology, who can’t?

As Billy Bragg said, “here comes the future and you can’t run from it.” Instead, why not take a little time to practice enhancing your video conferencing image? Be sure you bring an audience-centred approach to your remote talks, just as you would with an in-person presentation, demonstration, or panel. Here are a few ideas to help:

1: Find a good location. Check what’s in the frame. Are there distractions in the background? Take a moment to clear clutter, and to ensure that you’re angled away from windows. You want light shining directly onto your face, not into the camera - make it easy for your audience to see you.

2: Find good placement. Before your talk, raise your computer or camera up so it sits at eye level (when you’re looking straight ahead, chin parallel to the ground). This is a much better angle for your audience to read your expressions and perceive gesture and body language. (Bonus: it’s also more flattering)

3: Find your focus. Remember that you’re speaking through a screen to actual people. While you’re presenting, be conscious of looking down or dropping your eyes to your notes too often. Lift your gaze into the camera so that viewers feel more connected to you and can take in what you’re saying. Give them a chance to benefit from your expertise.

Some people say that remote presentations can never be as good as live ones, that “in-person” is always better than “virtual”. I might question that premise. Maybe it depends on how we define “better”, and what we want it to be “good” for.

But that’s a longer conversation…which, fortunately, we can have on any number of channels.

 

The Words We Use Still Matter

image-asset.jpeg

I’m still pondering this question, and thought I’d re-post this piece:

Recently I listened to an interview with a woman who is a researcher at a respected Canadian university.  The topic was the reporting of terrorist attacks.  Her assertion was that words matter – that the words chosen by reporters can define as well as describe the event, and therefore affect public reaction and political response.

She was an intelligent woman and she made strong points.  But it was her own use of words that struck me.  She frequently used “fillers” -- the umms and uhhhs, those little habitual placeholders we throw in while organizing our thoughts. And by the way, Emma Taylor offers great insights on controlling verbal fillers . You’ll want to read her take on it.

In this particular interview, “y’know” was a biggie, but the one that really got me was “sort of”.  It got me partly because she used it a lot, but more in her particular placement of it.  

Each time she made a strong assertion, she preceded the strongest or most definitive word with “sort of”:

“…an act is terrorism if it, sort of, clearly provokes terror and fear…”

“The, sort of, actual risks…we’ve all seen those charts that show the, sort of, actual statistical probability of dying in a terrorist attack…”

“…in the, sort of, immediate coverage…”

 “The recent shooting was…a typical example of the, sort of, folly of, y’know, hasty and careless reporting…”

How is something done “sort of” clearly?  Can statistics be “sort of” actual ?

I want to be clear: I do not mean to ridicule her or diminish her arguments in any way.  They were rigorous, observant, well constructed and backed up with good evidence.  She was articulate and well educated, clearly an expert in her field.  Yet when she spoke, she undermined her status.  Her “sort of”s served as apologies for her statements.  Ever so subtly – maybe subconsciously – she was ensuring that what she said wouldn’t make her appear too strong, too assertive.
 
Of course men use fillers when they speak as well, but in my experience they generally place them in between thoughts: “So, y’know, the point I’m making is…” and so on.  Once the thought has been formulated in the brain, it’s spoken without being subverted or undermined along the way.

So is this another form of “don’t speak up too much or too often”?  “You don’t want to come across as a strident, opinionated harpy”?  Do we need another hashtag, #TalkLikeAWoman, to go with #DressLikeAWoman?  Because I’m not crazy about #IAmSortOfAStrongConfidentWoman, or #IAmSortOfAnExpertInMyField.  When women own it, as they very much and very often do, I want to hear them own it.  Full stop.

The famous voice teacher Patsy Rodenburg says, “we have to stand by what we say”.  It’s a big thing to do, to commit fully to the words we utter and the ideas carried through them.  It’s not always easy.  But we are living in adventurous times and, as uncomfortable as it is to put ourselves on the line, our lives may get much more uncomfortable if we don’t.